For Immediate Release: March 31, 2004
Contact: Kirsten Stade (202) 265-7337
LEAVITT DAMPENS EPA CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT — Promised Reforms Not Implemented, Vacancies Unfilled, Prosecutions Falling
Washington, DC -- In his first months in office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Leavitt has de-emphasized the role of criminal enforcement, left a raft of key vacancies unfilled and failed to implement promised reforms of the agency's criminal program, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). At the same time, 2003 Justice Department figures show that EPA has the lowest rate of prosecution for any major federal agency, with fully two-thirds of its criminal cases rejected.
This February Leavitt addressed EPA's Criminal Investigation Division (CID) field managers saying he was "concerned" about stories he had heard about heavy-handed enforcement. Leavitt intimated that he would inject himself into criminal cases if he felt they were inappropriate.
As if underlining Leavitt's discouragement of enforcement, top positions in the criminal program have been left vacant since the fall:
Compounding this leadership vacuum, key recommendations of a major management review of EPA's criminal program completed last fall have not been implemented. Tightening EPA's referral process of cases for prosecution, adopting performance measures, engaging an independent law enforcement audit, consolidating field offices and revamping a much criticized hiring and promotion system are among the languishing reforms hailed when the management review was unveiled in December but ignored since.
"Mike Leavitt touts an approach that he calls ‘Enlibra,' which apparently means ‘polluters go free' in Latin," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, whose organization's survey of EPA criminal enforcement agents last spring prompted the management review. "Enforcing anti-pollution laws requires not only trained investigators but also leadership committed to prosecution when so-called ‘win-win solutions' fail to serve the public good."
Perhaps not surprisingly, EPA's criminal program appears adrift. According to the Executive Office of US Attorneys figures compiled by Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) --
The prosecution rate is a telling measure of the quality of completed investigations and whether case numbers are being inflated.
"These low prosecution rates and jail terms strongly suggest that corporations who flout anti-pollution laws will continue to enjoy competitive advantages over those companies who commit resources to environmental compliance," Ruch argued.
###
See TRAC figures documenting the low and falling prosecution rates for EPA criminal cases
Overall Federal Criminal Enforcement Prosecution Rate Through 2003
Compare EPA's prosecution rate to the rates of other agencies
Read the EPA's Management Review for its Office of Criminal Enforcement