Maintaining Scientific Integrity
Public agency scientists are under growing political pressure to alter, dilute, or suppress their findings on issues of controversy. All too frequently, government leaders repudiate or interfere with the work of scientists when evidence supports policies that threaten powerful interests. This is especially true for those scientists working on environmental and public health issues, who must contend with:
- The suppression of science related to climate change and energy uses;
- Altering or disregarding environmental impact assessments;
- Interference in research and staff decisions;
- Retaliation for conclusion that are inconvenient to a political viewpoint or that expose scientific integrity abuses.
For each story in the news, scores of other instances are taking place behind the scenes in government laboratories, in grant review sessions, and in field stations across the country. On issues ranging from climate change to children’s health to pollution permits to land management issues, public agency scientists are being censored, obstructed, and marginalized.
PEER provides free, accessible, and completely confidential legal consultation and counsel to government scientists. We work to keep government science strong, independent, and transparent so that it can support effective decision-making.
NEWS FROM PEER
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Trump Agencies Purging Dissenting Information from the Administrative Record
Muddled and Conflicting Policies Put Scientists in “Publish and Perish” Dilemma
Legally Dubious Curbs on Scientific Studies Hamstring Public Health Protections
Transparency Should Extend Beyond Calendars to Include Science
Washington State University Pays Researcher Targeted by Industry to Leave Campus
Pruitt Sued to Produce Noninterference Directives He Claims to Have Issued
Professor Still under Siege as WSU Seeks Ways to Accommodate Ranchers
Bernhardt Aided Misleading Congress about Oil Drilling Effects in Arctic Refuge
Washington State U. Scientist Says Official Restraints Due to Political Pressure
Scientists Say Politics and Fear Loom Over Agricultural and Forestry Research
Political Screening of Science Backfires as Scientific Integrity Policies Dangle
Independent Accreditation Urged to Ensure Integrity of Research Results
Confidential Agency Panel Approves Censorship and Media Gag Orders
Unconstitutional Restraints on Publishing and Weak Integrity Protections at Issue
Topic Deemed “Not Appropriate” for Official and Outreach Education Programs
Whistleblower Complaint Highlights Official Obstruction of Pesticide Studies
Several Key Components Still Missing with No Scheduled Completion
U.S. Geological Survey Shirks Responsibility for Managing Troves of Specimens
Agency Scientific Integrity Policy Riddled with Gags, Gaps and Loopholes
Whistleblower Hearing Traces Corruption and Retaliation Back to Director’s Door